- #IS IT GOOD TO LEARN VISUAL BASIC FOR EXCEL CODE#
- #IS IT GOOD TO LEARN VISUAL BASIC FOR EXCEL PC#
- #IS IT GOOD TO LEARN VISUAL BASIC FOR EXCEL WINDOWS#
(It was an odd criticism, considering that inheritance is often a great way for less skilled developers to shoot themselves in the foot - exactly the sort of feature VB didn’t need.) In fact, classic VB was no object-oriented slouch. Object-oriented fanatics often complained that VB lacked support for inheritance. The problem with classic VBĬlassic VB had a bad reputation in many circles. This was the unwritten theme of Visual Basic - it gave you the freedom now that you’d regret later.
![is it good to learn visual basic for excel is it good to learn visual basic for excel](https://fthmb.tqn.com/Eg6CHWnLGcOeBU5g19M_pcui14o=/1600x900/filters:fill(auto,1)/excel-2013-screen-parts-56a8f8495f9b58b7d0f6d0ef.jpg)
Now you could create web pages that talked to VB components, called databases, and wrote HTML on the fly.Īll of this happened with virtually no structure, unless you chose to create one yourself. Visual Basic wormed its way into company offices and even onto the web through ASP (Active Server Pages), another monstrously popular technology. And they weren’t just mocking up toy applications. By the release of VB 6 - the last version of classic Visual Basic - it was estimated that there were ten times more coders writing in VB than in the unforgiving C++ language. What started as a friendly environment for beginners grew into a tool that was capable enough for serious programmers. The original Visual Basic thrived for roughly a decade. This was a sharp difference from almost every other programming environment known to humanity, which force developers to recompile their work and start over after every change.
![is it good to learn visual basic for excel is it good to learn visual basic for excel](https://www.automateexcel.com/images/vba/vba-editor.png)
Instead, VB became famous for a legendary feature called edit-and-continue, which allowed developers to run their programs, find problems, fix them, and then keep going with the new code. And though historians love to talk about the visual part of Visual Basic, its signature ability had nothing to do with graphical widgets. There was simply no other tool that a developer could use to sketch out a complete user interface and get coding as quickly as VB. Instead, you wrote friendly-looking VB code, like a civilized person.Īll the graphical pizzazz was impressive, but the real secret to VB’s success was its practicality.
#IS IT GOOD TO LEARN VISUAL BASIC FOR EXCEL WINDOWS#
And you didn’t use cryptic C++ code, with piles of classes, complex memory management, and obscure calls into the Windows API. To make a button do something, all you had to do was double-click it in the design environment and write some code. You could create buttons for your programs by drawing them on the surface of a window, like it was some kind of art canvas. At the same time that Microsoft released Windows 3.0 - the first version that was truly successful-they also launched Visual Basic 1.0.
#IS IT GOOD TO LEARN VISUAL BASIC FOR EXCEL PC#
But the game changed when Microsoft released Windows, and catapulted PC users into a graphical world of buttons and clicks. QuickBASIC was an impressive feat for the ancient days of text-based computer systems.
#IS IT GOOD TO LEARN VISUAL BASIC FOR EXCEL CODE#
When you run a program in QB64, it performs a clever sleight of hand - first it translates your BASIC code into C++, and then it compiles it. It runs on Windows, MacOS, and Linux, with no emulator required. Or is it? An innovative project called QB64 has created a modern QuickBASIC replica.
![is it good to learn visual basic for excel is it good to learn visual basic for excel](https://cdn.imgbin.com/12/8/17/imgbin-microsoft-excel-course-visual-basic-for-applications-student-microsoft-JctdnDQdSB7Uqag7gU3JRycHk.jpg)
These days, QuickBASIC is just another curiosity of the distant past.